<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mixed feelings about a transsexual breakthrough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.benjaminteicher.com/2008/12/mixed-feelings-about-a-transsexual-breakthrough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.benjaminteicher.com/2008/12/mixed-feelings-about-a-transsexual-breakthrough/</link>
	<description>Creative type with a fetish for mildly impossible worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:50:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.benjaminteicher.com/2008/12/mixed-feelings-about-a-transsexual-breakthrough/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benjaminteicher.com/blog/?p=51#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Yes, we should be of wary using science to justify social policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we should be of wary using science to justify social policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.benjaminteicher.com/2008/12/mixed-feelings-about-a-transsexual-breakthrough/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benjaminteicher.com/blog/?p=51#comment-15</guid>
		<description>As is often the case with scientfic truth, one merely needs to wait for the subsequent issue of the relevant journal for that truth to be undermined.

Pluto is a stark example of the way in which self-evidence can be instantaneously overturned by consensus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As is often the case with scientfic truth, one merely needs to wait for the subsequent issue of the relevant journal for that truth to be undermined.</p>
<p>Pluto is a stark example of the way in which self-evidence can be instantaneously overturned by consensus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.benjaminteicher.com/2008/12/mixed-feelings-about-a-transsexual-breakthrough/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 04:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benjaminteicher.com/blog/?p=51#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Excellent point. And this is why we should remain vigilant against this drift towards an all-embracing scientism.

Still, its funny to line up along the side of those who say that such &#039;deviant&#039; identities are a choice, or learned, and can be unlearned, though we do not really line up on their side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent point. And this is why we should remain vigilant against this drift towards an all-embracing scientism.</p>
<p>Still, its funny to line up along the side of those who say that such &#8216;deviant&#8217; identities are a choice, or learned, and can be unlearned, though we do not really line up on their side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas</title>
		<link>http://www.benjaminteicher.com/2008/12/mixed-feelings-about-a-transsexual-breakthrough/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 01:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benjaminteicher.com/blog/?p=51#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Excellent blog entry, Ben. This &quot;breakthrough&quot; is highly reminiscent of the movement within the gay community to assert a genetic basis for homosexuality (witness the popular gay magazine, DNA). The desire to ascribe a scientific basis to &quot;other&quot; identities tends to actually reaffirm the prevailing discourse, since it implies that a non-scientific (eg social, psychological) basis for those identities is disordered, unjustified, or erroneous, and moreover, that the &quot;otherness&quot; need be investigated, scrutinised, and justified in the first place. Perhaps even more damagingly, such scientific ascription can also tend to imply that, where there is no scientific basis, the &quot;disorder&quot; or &quot;error&quot; must be the subject&#039;s own &quot;fault,&quot; or alternatively, the result of a tragic or regrettable set of personal circumstances. Such implications are to be avoided, as they further de-legitimise the identity itself, and tend deny or obscure the relationship of oppression between the subject position and society generally. Etc etc etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent blog entry, Ben. This &#8220;breakthrough&#8221; is highly reminiscent of the movement within the gay community to assert a genetic basis for homosexuality (witness the popular gay magazine, DNA). The desire to ascribe a scientific basis to &#8220;other&#8221; identities tends to actually reaffirm the prevailing discourse, since it implies that a non-scientific (eg social, psychological) basis for those identities is disordered, unjustified, or erroneous, and moreover, that the &#8220;otherness&#8221; need be investigated, scrutinised, and justified in the first place. Perhaps even more damagingly, such scientific ascription can also tend to imply that, where there is no scientific basis, the &#8220;disorder&#8221; or &#8220;error&#8221; must be the subject&#8217;s own &#8220;fault,&#8221; or alternatively, the result of a tragic or regrettable set of personal circumstances. Such implications are to be avoided, as they further de-legitimise the identity itself, and tend deny or obscure the relationship of oppression between the subject position and society generally. Etc etc etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://www.benjaminteicher.com/2008/12/mixed-feelings-about-a-transsexual-breakthrough/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benjaminteicher.com/blog/?p=51#comment-12</guid>
		<description>in an era after god, science has replaced the soul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in an era after god, science has replaced the soul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susanha</title>
		<link>http://www.benjaminteicher.com/2008/12/mixed-feelings-about-a-transsexual-breakthrough/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>susanha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 06:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benjaminteicher.com/blog/?p=51#comment-11</guid>
		<description>This Froth reminds me of the genetic testing that occurred in Tasmania latterly of people identifying as indigenous.  It was to determine voting eligibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Froth reminds me of the genetic testing that occurred in Tasmania latterly of people identifying as indigenous.  It was to determine voting eligibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

